How We Run Better Meetings | The Accountability System That Works
We run a leadership development company. We teach managers how to build a culture of accountability, run team meetings that don't waste time, and create systems that make follow-through the default, not the exception.
Our meetings used to be a mess.
Not the kind of mess we'd admit to clients. The quiet kind. The kind where action items lived in three places: a Slack thread, a Google Doc, and someone's memory. Three places. Decisions got made on Tuesday, forgotten by Thursday, and rediscovered the following Monday with a "wait, who was doing that?" look on everyone's face.
This is the part nobody warns you about when you start a company. You can know all the theory. You can teach accountability and effective feedback to hundreds of managers a year. But if your own workflows don't match what you preach, the lack of accountability will catch up to you. It caught up to us.
Here's how we fixed it.
The Real Problem Wasn't Discipline. It Was Design.
For a long time, I thought our follow-through problem was a people problem. Maybe the team wasn't committed enough. Maybe they needed to "care more." That's the trap most founders fall into. When something breaks, we look at the team members first and the system last.
But that's backwards.
Patrick Lencioni nailed this in The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: a lack of accountability is almost never about effort. It's about clarity. When people don't know what was decided, who owns it, or when it's due, they don't avoid the work because they're lazy. They avoid it because the system never made it clear enough to act on.
Our meetings had no clear agenda going in. No record of action items coming out. No mechanism for those items to follow anyone from one week to the next. We were relying on memory and good intentions. If you've ever tried to run a growing company on memory and good intentions, you know how that goes.
The problem was never effort. It was architecture.
The Bookend System: How Our Weekly Meetings Actually Work
About a year ago, we redesigned our entire meeting structure around one principle: every week gets bookends.

Monday opens it. Friday closes it. Everything in between is departmental. And every single meeting runs through Fellow, the AI meeting assistant and notetaker that made the whole thing stick.
Here's the playbook:
Monday: Weekly Project Planning (All Team Members)
Every team member outlines their weekly tasks, key metrics they're tracking, and the initiatives they're pushing forward. This isn't a status update where everyone reads off a list. It's a commitment ceremony. You're telling the whole team what you're going to do this week. Out loud. With due dates.
The Monday meeting forces clear communication before the week even starts. It eliminates the "I didn't know that was a priority" conversations that burn time on Wednesday.
Tuesday through Thursday: Departmental Huddles
Tuesday is sales. Wednesday is marketing. Thursday is product. These are short, focused check-ins where each department handles its own blockers, reviews dashboards and initiatives, and solves problems in real-time without pulling the whole team in. The right people in the right room, working on the right things.
Friday: End-of-Week Check-In (All Team Members)
This is where the loop closes. What got done? What didn't? What needs to be realigned heading into next week? The Friday meeting isn't about catching people. It's about catching issues. When something slips, we don't ask, "Why didn't you do this?" We ask "what got in the way?" That's problem-solving, not policing.
The bookend structure sounds simple. It is simple. But the simplicity is the point. Most meeting systems fail not because they're too basic but because they're too complicated to sustain. This one survives because it's light enough to run every single week without creating burnout for the team.
Why the Tool Matters More Than You Think
I used to believe that tools were secondary to culture. That if you had the right people and the right values, you could track things on sticky notes and be fine.
I was wrong.
The tool is the culture.
When we started using Fellow, three things changed almost immediately.
- Every meeting has a clear agenda before anyone shows up. Not because we suddenly became more disciplined. Because the template is right there, staring at you. Fellow makes it mildly embarrassing not to prepare. And that gentle social pressure is worth more than any time management training.
When your team members can see the agenda beforehand, they come ready. The meeting starts at the hard part instead of spending fifteen minutes getting everyone up to speed. That shift alone cut our wasted time in half.
Now, with Ask Fellow, they’ve made it even easier to prepare with the help of an AI agent that reminds you of outstanding action items and suggests talking points based on the previous conversation. There are no longer any excuses to show up to a meeting unprepared. - Action items don't disappear anymore. They follow you from meeting to meeting. That thing you said you'd do last Tuesday? It's sitting there in next Tuesday's agenda, staring at you. No one has to chase it. No one has to remember it. The system remembers for you.
This is what real team accountability looks like. Not a manager hovering. Not a Slack ping on Friday afternoon. Just a system that surfaces commitments automatically, so the follow-up happens without anyone playing the role of accountability cop.
- Status updates became useful instead of performative. Before Fellow, our check-ins were theater. People would give vague updates that sounded productive but didn't actually tell you whether the initiative was on track. Now, with action items carrying forward and key metrics visible, the conversation shifts to what matters: where are the bottlenecks, what decisions need to be made, and what are the next steps.
For founders and CEOs running small teams, this is the real unlock. You can't always be in every room. You can't always work ON the business because you're busy working IN it. But when every meeting has a record, every action item has an owner, and every week has bookends, you don't need to be in every room. The system holds the context, even when you can't.
This is especially true for remote work or hybrid teams, where the informal "hey, whatever happened with that thing?" hallway conversation doesn't exist. Without a system to carry context forward, things fall through the cracks at double the speed. The tool fills the gap that proximity used to fill.
What This Has to Do With High-Performing Teams
I've spent years studying and teaching what makes teams perform at their peak. Our Six Levels of High-Performing Teams framework starts with psychological safety and builds up through empowerment, communication, leadership culture, innovation, and vision.
Meetings sit right in the middle of that stack. They're where communication either works or breaks down. They're where empowerment either gets reinforced or quietly eroded.
When your weekly meetings lack structure, follow-through, and accountability, you're sending your team a message: what you commit to doesn't really matter. That erodes trust. It kills decision-making velocity. And over time, it creates a work environment where the most reliable people burn out and the least reliable people hide.
I've seen this pattern play out in virtual meetings and in-person ones alike. The medium doesn't matter. What matters is whether commitments made inside the meeting carry weight outside of it. Without that, your meetings become a performance everyone endures rather than a tool everyone uses.
Research from Gallup shows that managers account for 70% of the variance in employee engagement. And a huge portion of that engagement is shaped by how meetings are run. Are they useful? Do they respect people's time? Does what you say in the meeting actually translate into what happens during the week?
Effective meetings aren't about having fewer meetings. They're about making the meetings you have actually mean something.

The Playbook: Build Your Own Bookend System
If you're reading this thinking "we need something like this," here's how to start. You don't need to overhaul everything at once. Start with the structure and let the culture follow.
Pick your bookends. Monday and Friday work for us. Maybe Tuesday and Thursday work for you if you're running remote work schedules that shift. The days matter less than the principle: open the week with commitments, close it with a review.
Pick your tool and commit to it. Fellow’s AI meeting notes work for us. Whatever you choose, the requirement is the same: it needs to carry action items from one meeting to the next, make agendas visible before the meeting, and give everyone a single source of truth. Not Slack. Not email. Not someone's memory.
Run departmental huddles in between. Keep them short. Keep them focused. The goal isn't strategic planning. It's tactical clearing of bottlenecks and real-time problem-solving. Sales, marketing, product, ops, whatever your departments are. Get the right people together and get them unstuck.
Close the loop on Friday. Don't skip the end-of-week check-in. This is where retention of commitments lives. This is where you catch the pattern of things slipping before they become a crisis. It's where you build the muscle of honest, low-stakes reflection. What worked. What didn't. What changes next week. That's it. The Friday meeting also serves as the root cause detector. When the same initiative stalls three weeks in a row, it's not a discipline issue. It's a signal that something structural is broken: unclear ownership, competing priorities, or a resourcing gap that nobody wants to name. The bookend system surfaces those patterns before they become expensive problems.
Start small, stay consistent. A template that runs every week beats a complex dashboard that gets abandoned in three weeks. Build the habit first. Refine the system later. For small teams especially, consistency matters more than sophistication.
The Irony of Teaching What You Need to Learn
There's an uncomfortable truth about running a business coaching and leadership development company. You are never done learning the things you teach.
We teach decision-making frameworks. We teach OKRs and goal-setting. We teach managers how to build feedback cultures that drive team performance.
And for a while, our own meetings were the cobbler's shoeless children.
The fix wasn't a revelation. It wasn't a new theory or a breakthrough insight from a keynote. It was a system. A boring, repeatable, week-over-week system that made it harder to forget things than to follow through on them.
That's the bottom line about accountability. It's not a personality trait. It's not something you either have or you don't. It's a system you build, maintain, and show up to. The meeting where you make the commitment, and the meeting where you report back on it, with a tool in the middle that holds the space between.
We teach managers to build accountability systems. Turns out, we needed one too.
Want to build better systems for your team? Book a diagnostic call and let's figure out where your operating cadence needs work.
FAQs
Now that you have mastered how to manage conflict - what is your plan of action for making an impact with your team?
Now that you have mastered how to create an environment of empowerment via the 3-P's - what is your plan of action for making an impact with your team?
Developing Your Communication, Empathy and Emotional Intelligence skills is start. What is your plan of action for implementing your learnings within your your team?
Now that you understand the differences in these titles - what is your plan of action for what you learned?
Assessing your team's behaviors is a start - but do you have a plan of action for the results?
Now that you have mastered the art of decision making - what is your plan of action for making an impact with your team?
.png)
A DISC Behavior Assessment is the best way to understand your team's personalities.
Each DISC Assessment includes a Self Assessment and DISC Style evaluation worksheet

-23.avif)





.webp)

